Mat Performance Tables 2017

Schools or colleges covering 16 18 study in this mat s performance data.

Mat performance tables 2017.

Hat exclusion policy mat complaints policy 2019 20. For example knowing a mat had a progress 8 score of 0 2 in 2018 and a score of 0 2 in 2019 tells you how the mat compared to the national average in those years but not whether its performance improved across years. Including the impact of a change to performance measures and a look at mat disadvantage figures. Performance tables ofsted reports policies.

More than half of mats fell below the average for progress 8 performance measures last year despite a slight improvement on the year before. The government has today published its multi academy trust mat performance league tables based on 2017 exam results. City of norwich school an ormiston academy. Number of 16 18 students included in 2019 mat performance measures academic qualifications cohort.

Key stage 2 mat performance in 2017 current year measures table 1. Mat havering child left at school policy 2017 21. With the mat for at least 3 full academic years and have results in the 2016 school performance tables. Multi academy trust performance measures 1 school types and characteristics information as published in the 2017 school performance tables.

Please take care when drawing conclusions about a mat s improvement or fall in performance based on progress 8 alone. It is based on measures of progress for mats with 3 or more academies that have been with the mat for at least 3 full academic years and have results in the 2017 school performance tables. Number of 16 18 students included in 2019 mat performance measures applied general qualifications cohort. Those schools had been with the mat for at least three academic years.

Mat performance measures.